Encyclopedia of the Great Plains

David J. Wishart, Editor


"Railroad politics" is the term used to summarize the bargaining among railroads and their investors, employees, customers, and public officials. This bargaining has at different times centered on the location of railroad lines and supporting facilities, the quality of service provided by railroad companies, the wages paid to employees, the profits returned to investors, and, especially, the charges imposed on passengers and freight shippers.

Although the first railroads penetrated the Great Plains of the United States in the 1860s, it was the 1880s that saw enormous expansion. In that decade railroad firms laid more miles of track in the United States than in any comparable time period anywhere in the world. Similarly, north of the forty-ninth parallel the decade of the 1880s saw the completion of the Canadian Pacific, Canada's first transcontinental railway. The result in the Great Plains was a land boom and rapid population growth. The particular location of the rail lines was often a matter of political bargaining. Land speculators, town builders, and municipal officials vied to have railroads come to their favored location because of the economic vitality that rail service promised. Fully three-quarters of the towns incorporated in Alberta were established by railway companies. Towns that did not enjoy direct access to the railroad network either stagnated or died. Locations favored with railroad junctions, railroad yards (sidetracks for the storage and sorting of equipment), terminal facilities, and maintenance shops were especially likely to boom economically in the late nineteenth century in the Plains. Calgary actually bribed the Canadian Pacific to obtain its maintenance shops and freight yards.

Railroad companies built too many lines in the Great Plains for all to be profitable, and by the depression years of the 1890s several major carriers were bankrupt but still operating. Competition for the most profitable long-haul freight and passenger traffic was intense. Although improvements in operating efficiencies had led to lower rates, farmers and merchants dependent on railroad service often complained that charges were too high. Some in the Plains argued for public ownership of the railroads to ensure their operation in "the public interest," a policy advocated by the populist movement. Shippers who complained about unjust freight rates also turned to state and federal regulation.

With a return to prosperity in the first years of the twentieth century, railroads and shippers continued to bargain for advantage, especially through a system of federal regulation strengthened by the Hepburn Act of 1906 and the Mann-Elkins Act of 1910. Railroads sought permission from regulators to increase rates so as to improve facilities and operating efficiencies. Employees seeking higher wages and investors seeking better returns supported the carriers, while shippers viewed rate increase requests suspiciously. The political bargaining among those groups was typically intense, with elected officials in the Great Plains voicing support for local merchants and farmers and expressing hostility toward the carriers.

The intensity of railroad politics gradually eased as improved highways and long-distance motor trucks lessened the dependence of shippers on the railroad serving their local area. Nevertheless, grain farmers depended on railroads for taking their products to market cheaply, and railroads continued to haul large volumes of other agricultural products and manufactured goods as well. After the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 deregulated the carriers, there were widespread mergers of competing railroads, as well as the integration of rail and motor truck freight services. This situation sometimes led to problems, especially in the 1990s when the Union Pacific Railroad was unable to manage operations e.ciently after taking over the Southern Pacific lines, and bitter complaints again emerged in Texas and other places in the Great Plains.

See also TRANSPORTATION: Railroads, United States; Railways, Canada.

K. Austin Kerr Ohio State University

Berk, Gerald. Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865-1917. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.

Hoogenboom, Ari and Olive. A History of the ICC: From Panacea to Palliative. New York: W. W. Norton Co., 1976.

Kerr, K. Austin. American Railroad Politics, 1914-1920: Rates, Wages, and Efficiency. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.

Previous: Progressive Conservative Party | Contents | Next: Rankin, Jeannette

XML: egp.pg.066.xml