<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<!-- <!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "-//UNL Libraries::Etext Center//DTD TEI.dtd (Nebraska Press)//EN" "include\TEI.dtd" [
]> -->

<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="egp.law.054">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="m" type="main">White Primary</title>
<title level="m" type="sub"></title>
<author>Michael W. Combs</author>
<editor>David J. Wishart</editor>
<respStmt>
<resp>Project Team</resp>
<name>Katherine Walter</name>
<name>Laura Weakly</name>
<name>Nicholas Swiercek</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition>
<date>2011</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno>egp.law.054</idno>
<authority>Encyclopedia of the Great Plains</authority>
<publisher>University of Nebraska&#8211;Lincoln</publisher>
<distributor>
<name>Center for Digital Research in the Humanities</name>
<address>
<addrLine>319 Love Library</addrLine>
<addrLine>University of Nebraska&#8211;Lincoln</addrLine>
<addrLine>Lincoln, NE 68588-4100</addrLine>
<addrLine>cdrh@unlnotes.unl.edu</addrLine>
</address>
</distributor>
<date>2011</date>
<availability>
<p>Copyright &#169; 2011 by University of Nebraska&#8211;Lincoln, all rights reserved. Redistribution or republication in any medium, except as allowed under the Fair Use provisions of U.S. copyright law, requires express written consent from the editors and advance notification of the publisher, the University of Nebraska&#8211;Lincoln.</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="project">

</note>
</notesStmt>

<sourceDesc>
<bibl><author n="Combs, Michael W.">Michael W. Combs</author>. <title level="a">"White Primary."</title> In <editor n="Wishart, David J.">David J. Wishart</editor>, ed. <title level="m">Encyclopedia of the Great Plains</title>. <pubPlace>Lincoln</pubPlace>: <publisher>University of Nebraska Press</publisher>, <date value="2004">2004</date>. <biblScope type="pages">465</biblScope>.</bibl>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>

<revisionDesc>
<change>
<date>2008-03-09</date>
<respStmt>
<name>Nicholas Swiercek</name>
</respStmt>
<item>Model Encoding</item>
</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text>
<body>


<div1>
<head type="main">WHITE PRIMARY</head>

<p>After Reconstruction, southern states began a
campaign to disfranchise African American
voters in order to eliminate the Republican
Party from Southern politics and safeguard
white supremacy. Various methods were used,
including poll taxes, literacy tests, and violence,
but by the 1920s a widely used method
of disfranchisement was the white primary. As
a political device, legitimized by state statutes,
the white primary effectively eliminated African
American voters from the electoral process
by barring them from primary elections.</p>

<p>In 1923 the intensity of opposition to the
white primary increased when Texas abandoned
the white primary by party rule and
enacted a law that prohibited the participation
of African Americans in a Democratic primary
election. From the 1920s through the 1950s the
<hi rend="smallcaps">NAACP</hi> waged a systematic legal campaign
against the white primary, arguing that it violated
the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.
When the <hi rend="smallcaps">NAACP</hi> prevailed in the U.S.
Supreme Court, supporters of white primary
statutes returned to state legislatures and enacted
laws that they thought would pass constitutional
muster. The Supreme Court upheld
Texas's white primary statute in <hi rend="italic">Grovey v.
Townsend</hi> (1935), holding that the Democratic
Party was a voluntary, private organization
that could determine its own membership
qualifications.</p>

<p>During the 1940s and 1950s the Supreme
Court began to chip away at the legality of
the white primary more decisively. In <hi rend="italic">United
States v. Classic</hi> (1941), for example, the Supreme
Court reversed the Townsend precedent,
arguing that the Constitution secured
the right to vote. In 1944 the Supreme Court
further eroded the power of the Texas white
primary in <hi rend="italic">Smith v. Allwright</hi>, ruling that the
state had violated the Constitution by providing
ballots at primary elections. This decision
largely ended the white primary in Texas. Between
1940 and 1947 the number of registered
African American voters in Texas jumped
from 30,000 to 100,000. Finally, in <hi rend="italic">Terry v.
Adams</hi> (1953), the Supreme Court prohibited
the legacies of the white primary, insisting that
the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment included
any election in which public issues are
decided or public officials are elected. In the
end, the persistence of the <hi rend="smallcaps">NAACP</hi> and the willingness
of the Supreme Court to create a more
democratic society eradicated the white primary
as a disfranchisement device.</p>

<p><hi rend="italic">See also</hi> <hi rend="smallcaps">AFRICAN AMERICANS</hi>: <ref n="egp.afam.014">Civil Rights</ref>.</p>

<closer>
<signed>Michael W. Combs<lb/>
University of Nebraska-Lincoln</signed>
</closer>
</div1>

<div1>
<bibl>Combs, Michael W. "The Supreme Court and African
Americans: Personnel and Policy Transformations." <title level="j">Howard Law Journal</title> 36 (1993): 139–84.</bibl> <bibl>Key, V. O., Jr. <title level="j">Southern Politics</title>. New York: Vintage Books, 1949.</bibl> <bibl>Woodward, C.
Vann. <title level="m">The Strange Career of Jim Crow</title>. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1966.</bibl>
</div1>


</body>
</text>
</TEI>